| Architectural competition |
A convenient trick to "consult" the
community, but it makes no difference because we will pick the
winner we want, anyway |
| Bitumen |
What we will use to build the 10m wide
footpath - sorry, we mean "the quality open space providing public
access to the foreshore" |
| Community consultation |
Community? Consultation? - Isn't that
where we get to do leaflet drops at taxpayer expense telling
the community what we are going to do to them |
| Development application |
A legal requirement. A DA has to be
approved before a development can proceed. Luckily it's not a big
deal because SHFA prepares, assesses and recommends its own
DAs |
| Enhanced public domain |
See bitumen and open
space |
| Foreshore |
Development opportunity |
| Government |
Who gets the money when we lease and
sell off public land |
| Heritage |
Inconvenient considerations a few cranks
use to obstruct our development plans |
| Income |
That's what we want, right now - don't
worry about long-term consequences |
| Jumbled overdevelopment |
What some people mistakenly think we
are creating on the harbour - they just don't understand high
quality development, with public access to the foreshore and
open spaces to create community neighbourhoods, when they see
them! |
| Known facts |
Information to be manipulated, for
example "building development on public land" = "giving public
access to the site for the first time in 100 years" |
| Link to the surrounding areas |
Buildings |
| Master plan |
The overall plan for a site's development - that
we can change if it doesn't suit us |
| Neighbourhood plaza |
A paved patch between road, buildings
and bitumen (see bitumen ) |
| Open space |
Paths and the bits of the development
between the building footprints |
| Public access to the harbour |
A path, half to one cricket pitch in
width |
| Quality development |
Residential units |
| Residential units |
That's where the money is, so we want
as many of these as we can get away with on each site |
| Statutory development process |
SHFA's power to prepare its own master
plans for approval by its minister, prepare its own development
applications, assess its own DAs, recommend them to the minister
for approval, and select a developer. Too bad if you don't like
it, coz it's legal. |
| Transparent, open development process |
Secret, closed development process |
| Urban renewal |
Opportunity for over development |
| View corridors |
What you are left with after we put
up foreshore buildings to block out the old views |
| Waterfront neighbourhood |
Buildings - with a neighbourhood plaza
(see "neighbourhood plaza") |
| Your concerns for open space |
SHFA addresses these by building multi
storey buildings on public land and calling the bits between building "quality
open space" |
| Zero |
The level of SHFA's respect for the
long-term interests of the community |
